This is a test blog article. Delete this one after testing the design.

Dec 12, 2025 | By Bud

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

Heading 1

Heading 2

Heading 3

Heading 4

Heading 5
Heading 6

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

  • list one
  • list two
    • list item 3
    • list item 4
  • List three
  1. list one
  2. list two
    • one two
    • teo onw
  3. five
  4. six

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

# Get two numbers from the user
num1 = float(input("Enter the first number: "))
num2 = float(input("Enter the second number: "))

# Calculate the sum
sum_result = num1 + num2

# Display the result using an f-string
print(f"The sum of {num1} and {num2} is: {sum_result}")

this is image caption.

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

Hastala vista is a gooq quote but rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

This is a detail box

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

this is a pull quote

citation
response response response response response
response response response response response
response response response response response
response response response response response
response response response response response
what is a verse?

However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized. Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.However, the challenge teams face is that tool-calling formats aren’t standardized.

Different models have different response formats that use different templates and syntaxes. For example, gpt-oss uses the Harmony response format, while others like Llama and DeepSeek follow their own conventions. If you want to evaluate or switch between models, you often end up manually switching to different tool parsers or rewriting tool-call parsing logic each time, which is tedious and error-prone.

Bud

Bud

Related Blogs

Reinventing Guardrails – Part 1: Why Performance, Latency, and Safety Need a New Equation
Reinventing Guardrails – Part 1: Why Performance, Latency, and Safety Need a New Equation

As generative AI (GenAI) systems evolve from experimental tools to enterprise-grade applications, the balance between performance, cost, and safety has become a defining engineering challenge. Traditional approaches often treat these as separate priorities—optimize for speed first, then layer on safety—but the growing complexity of guardrails has made this trade-off unsustainable. Enterprises now need a new […]

Beyond Hardware: How Bud AI Foundry Helps OEMs Move from Devices to AI-Native Systems
Beyond Hardware: How Bud AI Foundry Helps OEMs Move from Devices to AI-Native Systems

In the early days of computing, machines came without an operating system. Users had to install one themselves, often requiring technical know-how. That changed in the 1990s, when operating systems like Windows and macOS began shipping preinstalled. This shift transformed the user experience—making computers easier to use out of the box, expanding access to non-technical […]

Beyond Bare Metal: How Bud AI Foundry Helps Cloud Service Providers Move from Bare Metal to AI-First Services
Beyond Bare Metal: How Bud AI Foundry Helps Cloud Service Providers Move from Bare Metal to AI-First Services

The rapid rise of Generative AI (GenAI) is sparking a new wave of global change, a movement that can only be described as the AI transformation. Much like the digital transformation that preceded it, this shift is forcing organizations to fundamentally rethink how they operate and innovate. As companies embark on their AI transformation with […]

NxtGen’s M for Coding, Powered by Bud—  India’s Alternative to Claude Code
NxtGen’s M for Coding, Powered by Bud— India’s Alternative to Claude Code

Together with NxtGen Cloud, we’re excited to introduce M for Coding — a coding assistant launched under NxtGen Cloud’s M GenAI platform and powered by Bud’s code-generation models and infrastructure. This is India’s alternative to Claude Code, delivering the same powerful coding experience at a much more cost-effective rate. India’s Alternative to Claude Code India […]